Wednesday, July 28, 2010

A Sad Day in the United States of America

It is a sad day in the United States of America when the Obama Administration and the Federal Government stands against a State that wants to protect its citizens.On July 28, 2010, Judge Susan Bolton, a Clinton Appointee, issued an injunction against the State of Arizona from implementing SB 1070, the Arizona Immigration Law.

When the ruling was released a CNN reporter was giddy stating the Obama Administration is not popping champagne corks yet, but it is a win for them. How is it a win for them? Governor Jan Brewer and the Arizona Legislators passed a law to protect their citizens. A good LEADER would have reached out to the Governor to help with this illegal invasion. Instead, the Obama Administration is basically opposed to Arizonans protecting themselves, because they filed suit against the Arizona law. President Barack Hussein Obama is a polarizing and divisive figure; and he is in violation of the Constitution he swore to uphold.

Greg Zotta
Republican Candidate for MO Senate 22

Friday, July 23, 2010

Silencing of the Truth Tellers

The NAACP posted the following on their website: The video of Shirley Sherrod released by Andrew Brietbart's Big Government Blog on July 19 didn't tell the full story. It was selectively edited to cast her in a negative light.

Andrew Breitbart is being portrayed as a villain in this incident because he posted the video on his website. Breitbart said the Shirley Sherrod video was about the NAACP not her. He said the NAACP called the Tea-Party Protesters racists and are still saying some black Congressman were called the N-word at the Capitol during the healthcare protest. These are false claims and Breibart has a $100,000 reward for any video proof of the allegations. No one has collected the reward, even though Jesse Jackson Jr. video-taped the walk.

People are claiming the Sherrod video was taken out of context; that Sherrod was talking about a parable that changed her viewpoint on race relations. The video was from a speech Shirley Sherrod made on March 27, 2010, at the 20th Annual NAACP Freedom Fund Banquet. In it she says, …“The first time I was faced with a having to help a white farmer save his farm…He took a long time talking, but he was trying to show me he was superior to me…But he had to come to me for help. What he didn’t know was …I was trying to decide how much help to give him.” (laughter) Although, the context of what Shirley was saying was not yet revealed,the crowd started laughing. I believe what Breibart was trying to say was that the video was about the NAACP and their reaction of laughter when she made the statement.

In the same speech Sherrod said, “I haven’t seen such mean-spirited people as I’ve seen lately over this issue of healthcare. Some of the racism we thought was buried; didn’t it surface. Now we endured eight years of the Bushes and we didn’t do the stuff these Republicans are doing because we have a black President.” Because you oppose Obama’s radical policies in his efforts to “spread the wealth,” you are called a RACIST.

On July 22,2010, Shirley Sherrod was on the John King show on CNN. King asked her, “If you had 30 seconds with Andrew Breitbart, what would you say?” Sherrod responded, “I’d tell him he’s a lie. He knew exactly what effect that would have on the conservative racist people he’s dealing with. That’s why I started getting the hate mail and hate calls.”

The Obama Administration, Statists, NAACP and the so-called Main-Stream Media want to marginalize and silence the Tea-Party movement, Andrew Breitbart, Fox News and Glen Beck with false claims of racism and telling lies. Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”

Greg Zotta
Republican Candidate for MO Senate 22

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Sarah Palin on Mosque and the Statists

On July 18, 2010, Sarah Palin Tweeted, "Peace-seeking Muslims, pls understand, Ground Zero mosque is UNNECESSARY provocation; it stabs hearts. Pls reject it in interest of healing."

Bloomberg’s aide Andrea Batista Schlesinger tweeted back “@SarahPalinUSA mind your business," and followed that up with: "@SarahPalinUSA whose hearts? Racist hearts?"

Well Ms. Schlesinger, it is America’s business. We were attacked by violent radical jihadists. We are not necessarily at war with Islam; however, Islam is at war with us. When Statists cannot discuss the merits of an argument, they resort to name-calling. Pitiful!

King Bloomberg defends the building of the mosque on first amendment grounds of religious freedom. Too bad, he forgets there is more than the first amendment, such as the second amendment, which he opposes.He has denounced calls to look into the group's funding. Why? He is a King because he coerced the New York legislators to make an exception to the term limit law so he could spend over $100 million to remain the Mayor of New York. You have to question why he is in support of the mosque, what is in it for him?

King Bloomberg is wrong on his endorsement of the mosque being built at “Ground Zero.” Islam is not just a religion; it is a religious system, a political system and a military system. The Muslim Brotherhood calls for a “Civilization-Jihadist Process,” in which they would destroy the Western civilization from within. Radical Muslims believe Americans are infidels; and the infidels will have to convert to Islam, be enslaved or be killed.They state, we do not want to democratize Islam, we want to Islamize democracy. That is what we want.

This mosque would be a symbol to the world of their conquest of 9/11 and should not be built there. It is an "in your face" to the American people.

The United States is a nation founded on Judeo-Christian principles and we tolerate other religions like Islam, but we do not want to become a Muslim nation and put under Sharia law and Honor Killings. That is why we must remain vigilant to protect our freedom.

Greg Zotta
Republican Candidate for Mo. Senate 22

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Social Security

Social Security was never meant to be paid out. FDR set it up as a slush fund. When it was started, the life expectancy for males was 61.4 years and for females, it was 65.7 years. They made the retirement age 65. These Politicians/Statists solutions to the problem with Social Security are to raise the retirement age, raise taxes, cut benefits or a combination of the three. Who are they to say when you can retire? People should be able to retire when they want to retire if they have the funds to do it. If people had their own retirement account they could retire when they wanted to. The way the system is set up now, bureaucrats have to much control over people's lives. My parents both worked all of their lives and retired on Social (In) Security. My father was receiving approximately $1400 a month and my mother $1200 a month. When my father died, my mother had to return the $1400 and received a $275 death benefit. She then began to receive $1400 a month, instead of the $1200 she had been receiving. She not only had to suffer the loss of her soul mate, but the household income was virtually cut in half, because of the tragedy of death. THIS SHOULD NOT HAPPEN! Everyone should have their own account that is set up to their risk tolerance. Families should not loose any of their retirement (estate) money because of a death; it should stay within the family.

Social Security is a PONZI scheme and needs to be eliminated over time, wherein people have their own accounts. Therefore, the solution is to take care of the people that were hoodwinked into the system and continue to pay their benefits. Then ween everyone else off of the system over time. That means the young people entering the work force would set up their own retirement account, but would have to contribute some extra to take care of grandma and grandpa. Organizations like the AARP want to keep the staus quo, where it is based on workers in the work force. A system that is bankrupting Social Security. It took the country 75 years to get to this point and it will take some time to fix the problem. The Bureaucrats are set up with their lavish pension system and are not on Social Security. These Statists in Congress want to keep control over the system, because they want control over our lives and a slush fund.

My suggestion is to immediately set up a system to take care of the people who are on it and ween the others off. Therefore, the moral and just thing to do is to have everyone have their own account and in control of their lives.

Greg Zotta
Republican Candidate for MO Senate 22

Another Obama LIE

Kathleen Sebelius assured. “These awards are being made on a case-by-case basis. There is no general plan that routinely authorizes federal funds to be used for abortions.”

Stupak said, “Staffers may have been unaware of his Executive Order or may not have read it. I know I didn’t read it. Heck, I didn’t have time to read much more than a small fraction of the healthcare bill itself before we voted on it.”

There is no general plan just a case-by-case basis.So far three states have federally funded abortions, (case-by-case basis). However, they claim Obama has not gone back on his deal, he did sign an executive order; it just is not being adhered to. I guess Stupak (Stupid) is justifying what is taking place to clear his conscience. What a HYPOCRITE!! I called and wrote his office prior to the vote stating executive orders on not worth the paper that they are written on. He voted on it anyway and now to this day said he did not read the massive bill. Obamacare was a power grab and about CONTROL.These Statists are a JOKE and need to be FIRED.

Greg Zotta
Republican Candidate for MO Senate 22

Thursday, July 15, 2010

O'Reilly, NAACP and the Tea-Party

On the O’Reilly Factor, July 15, 2010, O’Reilly was discussing the NAACP and racial politics in regards to the Tea-Party movement. They talked about a billboard that was put up by the Iowa Tea-Party that depicts Obama as a Democratic Socialist, surrounded by a Nazi Socialist in Hitler and a Marxist Socialist in Lenin. He stated if the Iowa Tea-Party put up the sign with a Hitler mustache on Obama that is an atrocity, period. The fact that they put it up disqualifies them. Really? There was not a Hitler mustache on Obama in the sign. In Obama’s own words, he has talked about the redistribution of wealth and several of his Democrat/Statists colleagues have called themselves Socialists. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is designated as a Socialist who caucuses with the Democrat Party. So Bill, Obama is a Socialist. However, the Iowa Tea-Party has removed the sign.

Greg Zotta

Republican Candidate for MO Senate 22

Why Racial Problems Exist in America

Marc Lamont Hill was on the O’Reilly Factor, July 14, 2010, and the discussion was on the NAACP calling the Tea-Party Protesters racists. Yet, the NAACP does not denounce the racist rhetoric coming from Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, or Samir Shabazz nor does Hill.

Hill claims he never heard anything racist from Jeremiah Wright and defends his First Amendment right to speak out. Try checking out videos of Wright on You-Tube.

Ben Jealous, President of the NAACP said,Tea-Partiers were carrying signs with slogans to lynch President Obama and lynch Eric Holder and the NAACP is calling for the Tea-Partiers to expel the racists. Hill said, a strong case can be made that racism exists in the Tea-Party, and those types of signs endanger the life of the President. O’Reilly said there is no evidence of the signs. Hill responded, “Just because you haven’t seen it” (the signs), implying just because you haven’t seen the signs doesn’t mean they don’t exist.” What??

Hill said the New Black Panther Party did not endorse the statement of Samir Shabazz calling for killing crackers and white babies. The action of what took place at that voting precinct was not even endorsed by the New Black Panther Party. When O’Reilly stated there are videos where Samir’s actions were endorsed, Hill claims he did not see that video.

Then he brings up the incident in Washington D.C. where several black Democrat representatives claimed they were called the N-word while walking through the crowd prior to the healthcare vote.These representatives made the false claim of being called the N-word. They are LIARS! They taped the whole walk. If they had anyone on the tape calling them the N-word, the so-call Main-Stream Media would loop it repeatedly. Instead, the media and Hill are perpetuating the lies. Remember, Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”

Hill states, the NAACP is a black advocating organization, and if the point of the organization is to defend black people why should they be out there beating up on the New Black Panther Party. (Justifying voter intimidation and death threats). The NAACP is designed to protect people of color; it is for the advancement of colored people.

For Hill’s information, the NAACP’s website states the following:


The mission of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate race-based discrimination.

Vision Statement

The vision of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is to ensure a society in which all individuals have equal rights without discrimination based on race.

Apparently, the NAACP has forgotten their Mission and Vision statement.

Marc Lamont Hill has a PH.D.(Piled High and Deep), and teaches African-American Studies at Columbia University. When he refuses to acknowledge racism coming from the NAACP, Farrakhan, Wright, Shabazz or Samir, you have to ask, who are the REAL RACISTS? You wonder why race relations are not improving when people like Hill have this kind of mindset. The bigger question is, “What is he teaching our children?”

Greg Zotta
Republican Candidate for MO Senate 22

Wednesday, July 14, 2010


Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” Now, the NAACP is calling the patriotic Tea-Party protesters RACISTS. They are trying to silence anyone who opposes Obama’s policies by demonizing them.

In Washington D.C. several black Democrat representatives claimed they were called the N-word while walking through the crowd prior to the healthcare vote. They purposely walked through the crowd hoping something would happen. When nothing happened, they made the false claim of being called the N-word. They are LIARS! Because they taped the whole walk. If they had anyone on the tape calling them the N-word it would be looped over and over again by the so-call Main-Stream Media. Instead, the lies are being perpetuated by the media.

Ben Jealous of the NAACP stated Tea-Partiers were carrying signs with slogans to lynch President Obama and lynch Eric Holder. Another LIE. If there were such signs the Secret Service would have been involved.

The Obama Administration’s Justice Department, led by Eric Holder refused to prosecute members of the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation. J. Christian Adams, who resigned from the Justice Department, stated the Justice Department dropped the case for racial reasons. Adams claims the administration has failed to prosecute non-whites when it comes to voting intimidation cases. Barack Hussein Obama is a divisive and polarizing figure, who is tearing this country apart. So, who are the REAL RACISTS?

The Tea-Party protesters are patriots exercising their First Amendment Rights and are opposed to Obama’s vision of transforming America. It is a good thing there are alternate sources of information out there to get the TRUTH.

Greg Zotta
Republican Candidate for MO Senate 22

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Give em Hell, Sheriff Joe Arpaio

 The Union pinhead, Stewart Asscup said, this is a Nation of Immigrants. Yes, but LEGAL IMMIGRANTS and there is a pathway to citizenship. The Union leaders are pushing for Amnesty so they can increase their roles and collect more dues so they can enrich themselves. Being a sovereign nation means, we are also a Nation of Laws. What Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Governor Jan Brewer are trying to do is protect their citizens something the Obama administration is reluctant to do. Don't forget, Obama took an oath of office, which he is in violation of, to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion.

What should be done is to enforce the laws already on the books, which includes securing the border, enforce the laws against the illegal immigrants and the employers, and deport those who are here illegally. Then you can work on streamlining the process to let legal immigrants into this country.They would have to learn and speak English and assimilate into the American culture. Corporations can then stop putting up dual language signs that are added costs to the citizens of this country due to the immigration problem.

Some people want "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" (Amnesty). These people claim the US cannot deport all of the illegal immigrants.They say they would have the illegal immigrants go to the back of the line. When pressed for a clarification as to where the back of the line is, they reluctantly say their old country. Wouldn't that be DEPORTATION? You do not reward people for BAD BEHAVIOR, because what do you tell the people that gained access to this country legally? To all the UNION leaders the key word is LEGAL.

Greg Zotta
Republican Candidate for MO Senate 22