The Assassination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh

Professor Christine Blasey Ford has made an unsubstantiated allegation that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a party decades ago with no corroboration. Ford does not know many of the details of the incident and has made conflicting and contradictory statements. She could not say when this supposed incident with Brett Kavanaugh happened. She did not know how she got to the party. She did not know how she got home from the party. She did not know how many people were at the party. She did not know where the party was at, but KNOWS 100% Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her.
There are so many inconsistencies, contradictions and outright lies by Ford that she should not be believed. Yet many people say she is credible, she is credible, she is credible when she was never challenged, because they are afraid to tell the truth that she is lying because of the #MeToo movement.
She continued to change her story even during her testimony at the hearing. If you tell the truth you do not have a problem remembering what happened. It is Liars who cannot remember their previous lies so their stories change.
It was at couple’s therapy in 2012 that supposedly brought out the memories of the assault. She and her husband were doing a remodel and she insisted on two doors in front of the house, because of the incident. The problem is the permits for the construction was taken out in 2008 according to public records and stated in a Gateway Pundit article. Therapy notes also did not mention Kavanaugh by name and Ford and her attorneys refuse to reveal the therapy notes to the committee even though she gave them to the Washington Post reporter.
Ford claims she was sexually assaulted by Bret Kavanaugh at a party in 1982. She stated the incident happened in the mid eighties, then the eighties and settled on 1982. She stated there were four boys in the room but then changed it to two. She stated there were four boys at the party and two girls, but later said four boys and another girl plus her. At the hearing she said there might have been more people at the party, but was unsure. The people she named was supposedly at the party said they were not at the party, refuted the sexual assault occurred, and could not corroborate her story. Bret Kavanaugh vehemently denies her allegation. So it comes down to a “he said, she said” accusation, so it comes down to credibility. Who are we to believe?
During the supposed incident she stated the bedroom door was locked, by whom? How did she get out, did she unlock the door? When she went up the stairs to use the bathroom she stated she was pushed and forced into the bedroom but did not know by whom. Where were Kavanaugh and Judge? Did they follow her up the stairs or were they already up there in the bedroom? Ford said music was being played in the bedroom and someone turned up the music, but did not know who. Why would the music be only playing in the bedroom when normally the music would be in the room of the party?
The Senate Judicial Committee acquiesced and appeased Ford and her attorneys by setting a date and time for the hearing and even offered to fly out to California to take her testimony, because she claimed she feared flying. Ford claims she is claustrophobic, because of the incident and has a fear of flying. Yet we learned at the hearing that she flies all the time. At the hearing she said she was not told by her attorneys of the offer by the committee to take her testimony in California. If that is the case then her attorneys were being highly unethical.
Another one of Ford’s demands and the most important one was that Kavanaugh could not be in the hearing room with her, because she feared him and now suffers PTSD. Yet, after the supposed incident she stated she attended numerous other parties where Kavanaugh was at and had no confrontation with Kavanaugh at any of the future parties she attended. Ford said, “I attended a bunch of parties that Brett also attended. We did not know each other well. I knew him and he knew me.”So,why did she stay if she was sooo traumatized?
She stated she saw Judge at Safeway and approached him. Why would she have approached him when he was supposedly involved in the incident that traumatized her? Another line she uses to make her story more credible is when she said Judge looked uncomfortable during the encounter, but he did say hi and converse with her. Again, most importantly, she was not uncomfortable attending parties that Kavanaugh was also attending during that time in the eighties with no problems and no fear.
Of all people, Senator DICK Blumenthal, Mr. Stolen Valor, who lied about his military service during the Vietnam War, lectured Kavanaugh about integrity and lying, when he asked if Kavanaugh knew the phrase, "False in one thing, false in everything?” Kavanaugh said he did. Blumenthal continued stating, “Meaning in jury instructions that we — some of us as prosecutors have heard many times, is — told the jury that they can disbelieve a witness if they find them to be false in one thing.” That would go for Ford’s testimony too, Blumenthal.
Ford claims that she was so upset with Kavanaugh’s nomination and wanted to stop it that on July 6, 2018 she anonymously contacted the anti-Trump Washington Post tip line making the allegation against Kavanaugh. Notice she did not contact the police, or her representatives in Congress or the President. She reported it to the propaganda media.
Another inconsistency in Professor Ford’s testimony was she would have you believe she did not know how to contact her representatives in Congress. She is a college professor with a PHD. She is in her fifties. You mean to tell me she has never voted and did not know her representatives in Congress? She did not know how to use Google and look up US House of Representatives and the US Senate? And what was with the baby voice? Was she doing a Howie Mandel’s Bobby impersonation? I believe she was coached to put on a performance to show how vulnerable she was to enhance her credibility.
Ford eventually contacted her US representative between July 6, 2018 and July 30, 2018 when she then sent a letter to Senator Diane Feinstein telling her of the incident and to keep the information confidential. Feinstein sat on the letter and did not contact any of the Republicans on the committee, nor did she contact the FBI or the President. Instead, Feinstein recommended a resistance anti-Trump lawyer Katz to represent her and Ford was given a polygraph examination. Feinstein and her DemonRAT allies on the committee waited till the most advantageous time to release the information to delay and obstruct the confirmation vote in order to thwart Kavanaugh from becoming a Supreme Court Justice.
Then they, (DemonRATS and propaganda media) ask what would be her motivation to come out with this allegation, what did she have to gain? Well, first of all, she is a member of the anti-Trump RESISTANCE movement, which wants to stop the Trump agenda. Then there is financial gain. As of 9/30/2018 they have raised $857888.00 on Go Fund Me accounts for her. Then there is the potential book deal.
The DemonRATS and the propaganda media state that the woman accuser has to be believed. It is up to Kavanaugh to prove he did not do the assault. In other words, Kavanaugh is guilty until he can prove his innocence. What they are missing is in this country you are to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. You have a right to due process. You have a right to confront your accuser. Piers Morgan does not agree with that assertion and tweeted, “Accusers should not be called ‘victims’ or ‘survivors’ until their stories have been investigated and corroborated. Otherwise, the accused is presumed guilty before he/she is even able to defend themselves. This is a basic tenet of law, surely?”
That is because sometimes women lie about being raped. Crystal Gail Magnum, Tawanda Glenda Brawley and Wanetta Gibson are women who falsely accused men of rape. Mangum is the Duke Lacrosse stripper who falsely accused members of the team of rape. She is currently serving time for murder. Then there is Tawana Brawley, who falsely claimed she was raped by white men and gave life to Al, Not So Sharp, Sharpton. Last is Gibson who falsely claimed she was raped by football player Brian Banks. She sued the school and won 1.5 million and he served time in prison. It has since been shown that she lied and he was released from prison.
This is all planned obstruction from the DemonRATS. If she truly was going to remain anonymous, why did she take a polygraph test? The polygraph results are just as suspect as the release of the information in her letter. Ford said she attended her grandmother’s funeral the day of the polygraph exam. When asked if the polygraph done August 7, 2018 was videotaped she could not recall if it was or not. Also Ford could not remember if she gave a copy of the letter or her therapy notes to the Washington Post reporter even though it was less than two months ago. Yet the DemonRATS want us to believe her memory from decades ago.
The DemonRATS hang their hopes Ford is to be believed because she took a polygraph exam, which to them proves she is telling the truth. First of all, polygraphs are unreliable and some people can beat them. That is why they are inadmissible in a court of law. Furthermore, she said she cried throughout the exam. She stated, “I remember being hooked up to a machine like being placed onto my body and being asked a lot of questions and crying a lot. (She was asked two questions) If the person getting the polygraph is crying or very emotional before and during the exam, the exam would give false positives and the examiner should have not gone through with the exam. On top of that, the examiner did not ask the pertinent question of Kavanaugh sexually assaulting her. Instead, Ford wrote a childlike statement about the supposed incident involving Kavanaugh that had corrections and scratch outs in it and then was asked the following two questions:

Is any part of your statement false? No.
Did you make up any part of your statement? No.

Then another question, why did she delete her social media posts prior to the information becoming public? What is she trying to hide? It has now been learned that her high school yearbooks have been scrubbed from the internet, why? Could it be because it would show she is a member of the RESISTANCE? Today she claims she is receiving threats, by whom and how so? Let's see the letters or texts and emails or hear the voice mails.

All of the DemonRATS on the Senate Judiciary Committee were not interested in the truth; they were interested in delaying the process by demanding yet another FBI background investigation on Judge Kavanaugh in an effort to derail his nomination to the Supreme Court. And they got their wish when anti-Trumper Senator Jeff Flake, the FLAKE, agreed to the DemonRATS wishes and voted to send the nomination to the senate floor with the stipulation that the FBI does an extended investigation into the allegations on Kavanaugh limited in scope and completed in less than a week. Otherwise, FLAKE will not vote to confirm Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. He did this after he was cornered in an elevator and screamed at by a George Soros funded agitator, but put no stipulations on the DemonRATS. He should have put conditions on them saying if the FBI finds that Ford was/is lying then they need to agree to confirm Kavanaugh and see what they would have said. But the FLAKE did not do that. So the circus will continue.
From day one the DemonRATS opposed the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh and would do anything to stop Kavanaugh from being confirmed. Twenty three minutes after President Donald Trump’s announcement of Kavanaugh being his pick to be his Supreme Court nominee Senator Chuck Schumer came out against it. Schumer tweeted “I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have, and I hope a bipartisan majority will do the same. The stakes are simply too high for anything less.”
Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon of the propaganda media and many other propagandists and DemonRATS in Congress were mocking Kavanaugh’s claim of a left wing Clinton conspiracy as if it is not or did not occur. Yet, contrary to their assertions there is evidence of the conspiracy. Alexandra Wilks, a Senior Advisor for America Rising Squared, was on the Laura Ingraham show on September 28, 2018 stated there is proof that there was/is a left wing conspiracy to destroy the Kavanaugh nomination. Left wing anti-Trump Brian Fallon, who was a former top spokesman for Hillary Clinton's failed presidential campaign, a confidante to Sen. Chuck Schumer, and an-ex senior official in Eric Holder's Justice Department, started up a group Demand Justice, funded by seed money from George Soros’s (dark money). Fallon stated his group would defeat any of President Trump’s Supreme Court nominees.Fallon stated, “Saving the Supreme Court from Trump’s clutches has always involved a very complicated two step process; first, block Kavanaugh, then fight like hell to win back the Senate. If Kavbanaugh drops out we’re halfway there. If Democrats are able to win back the Senate, we’d have a path to blocking Trump from picking any of the archconservatives on his short list.” His Demand Justice is a 501 C-4 group aligned with two other 501 C-4 groups the 1630 Foundation and Hillary Clinton’s Onward group in order to have unlimited, undisclosed funds.
The new tactic by the DemonRATS to thwart Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court is to portray Kavanaugh as a drunk, who blacks out and cannot remember what he does. They say he does not have the temperament to sit on the court. Does not have the temperament to sit on the court? It was the DemonRATS who acted like spoiled brats throwing a temper tantrum when they left the hearing room, yet they are the ones critical of Kavanaugh’s temperament? Remember, Jesus got very upset with the money changers in the temple and flipped over tables and was not very temperate.
The DemonRATS are un-American intolerant despicable hypocritical cretins. Their policies are detrimental and destructive to the citizens of this country. They and the propaganda media are the ENEMY of the people. You cannot compromise with DemonRATS. They need to be defeated.
The DemonRATS talk about this being sooo important because it is a lifelong appointment. Well, now would be a time to have an amendment to the Constitution implementing term limits not only for Supreme Court Justices, but for members of Congress too. And while they are at it when will the names of members of Congress are revealed who used taxpayer dollars to cover up their peccadilloes? And when will they be required to reimburse the taxpayers?

CNN Didn't Think It Was Funny ��

Symone Sanders is one ignorant, LOUD MOUTH stupid racist Bitch, who was on CNN,the Clinton News Network, spewing hate. It is Shameful that CNN, puts on this LEFTIST,Sanders as some EXPERT. The only thing this bitter leftist may be an expert on is propagating the LIES of the DemonRATs. She must be a product of Public School INDOCTRINATION, because she does not know what she is talking about.

“You’ll Never Be A Professional JOURNALIST!”, Lou Dobbs WRECKS CNN’s Jim...

Jim ACCACCA is NOT a journalist. He is a propagandist for CNN, Corrupt News Network.  The so-called Mainstream Media are failing at their responsibility to be the watchdogs over government afforded them under the First Amendment of the United States Freedom of the Press. Instead, they have become the propaganda arm of the DemonRATS and they are not to be believed. Thus they are un-American and the enemy of the people.

“He Is A CLOWN & A DRAMA QUEEN!”, Mark Levin PUTS Loser Jim Acosta In Hi...

Jim ACCACCA is NOT a journalist. He is a propagandist for CNN, Corrupt News Network.  The so-called Mainstream Media are failing at their responsibility to be the watchdogs over government afforded them under the First Amendment of the United States Freedom of the Press. Instead, they have become the propaganda arm of the DemonRATS and they are not to be believed.

"Is Birthright Citizenship Constitutional?" Tucker and Enrique DEBATE

Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4 gives Congress the authority over naturalization of people. So, there is no need to amend the Constitution, as with Article 5. Congress would only need to pass a bill or a resolution clarifying the intent of the framers of the 14th Amendment.

The Court ruled in the case of Wong Kim Ark that a child born in the U.S. of legal aliens,(not illegal aliens) was entitled to “birthright citizenship.” Same is true to legal U.S. citizens who have a child born outside the states. That child is a U.S. citizen, as is the case with John McCain, who was born in Panama to parents who were U.S. citizens.   

The Supreme Court is not infallible. They have ruled incorrectly many times. They incorrectly legislated from the bench in their most recent decisions on ObamaCare and Gay Marriage to name a few. 

Do you believe the framers of the 14th Amendment meant to give power and authority to illegal aliens to bestow US citizenship on the birth of their child simply by having the baby on U.S. soil?

I think not, because Congress passed The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, wherein, it bestowed citizenship on all Native Americans born within the territorial limits of the country.

Dr. Gorka on the left's reaction to the Trump-Putin summit

These are the people who voted to confirm a Communist to head the most powerful intelligence agency in the World the CIA.

Grouped By Vote Position 

YEAs ---63

Alexander (R-TN)
Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Brown (D-OH)
Burr (R-NC)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Collins (R-ME)
Coons (D-DE)
Corker (R-TN)
Cowan (D-MA)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Flake (R-AZ)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Graham (R-SC)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Kirk (R-IL)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Levin (D-MI)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Rubio (R-FL)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

NAYs ---34

Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fischer (R-NE)
Grassley (R-IA)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lee (R-UT)
McConnell (R-KY)
Merkley (D-OR)
Moran (R-KS)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sanders (I-VT)
Scott (R-SC)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Wicker (R-MS)

Not Voting - 3

Boxer (D-CA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Vitter (R-LA)

Trump meeting with Putin draws criticism from Republicans

To all the DemonRATS, anti-Trump RINOs and the propaganda media upset with President Donald Trump suspicions of the United States Intelligence Community need only look to these lying corrupt anti-Trump individuals in the FBI, DOJ and Intelligence Community:

Hussein Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan

Hussein Obama’s NSA Director James Clapper

 Hussein Obama’s FBI Director James Comey

Interim FBI Director Andrew McCabe

Acting AG Rod Rosenstein

Peter Strozk

Lisa Page

Special Consul Robert Mueller

These are not honorable people and need to be held accountable.

Exclusive interview with Papa John's founder John Schnatter

Papa John Schnatter was being grilled by a leftist propaganda marketing group Laundry Service was supposed to be helping Papa John's with their public relations on a conference call in May 2018, over his opposition to the anti-police, anti-military, anti- Trump, anti-flag, anti- National anthem, un-American kneeling thugs in the NFL. They baited and asked him what he was going to do to distance himself from the Ku Klux Klan (KKK).  What these leftists were asking Papa John was why are you a “racist?” And what are you going to do about it? He apparently got frustrated with the question, because he is NOT a racist, and responded by saying, “Colonel Sanders called blacks niggers,” and he never faced the same grade of backlash.” Papa John is NOT a racist so how do you prove a negative? He should have “put the shoe on the other foot” and asked the interviewer, why do you have sex with animals? 
 Two weeks after the call Laundry Service tried to extort Schnatter. Schnatter said, "They wanted 6 million dollars to make it go away. ... The words were, 'If I don't get my effing money, I'm gonna bury the founder,' said one of the executives. I'm not for sale."

What Papa John Schnatter said was the TRUTH. Nevertheless, because of his proper stance against the National Felon League’s disrespectful players he is being vilified by the leftist DemonRATS and the propaganda media.

Jimmy the Greek said the TRUTH about blacks on Monday Night Football and was fired for it. Hussein Obama was called "Head Nigga" at the correspondent’s dinner and everyone laughed about it, including Obama. LBJ said that with welfare he would have the niggers voting Democrat for two hundred years. FYI people it is OK to be WHITE.